IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kullan Daikawa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 33 4 13 17 0.515 0.0621 0.0621 0.1628 0.1628
2021-22 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 19 3 8 11 0.579 0.2149 0.2049 0.6129 0.5842
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SR 30 8 17 25 0.833
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 23 9 8 17 0.739
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 27 9 13 22 0.815
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 28 6 7 13 0.464
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Stout
+164.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25025
Forward overall
#953
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Antoine Bélisle
Middlebury · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Prescott
Nichols · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Musella Jr.
Stevenson · 2021-22
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.