IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Prescott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-08-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 46 10 37 47 1.022 0.2504 0.2550 0.7034 0.7163
2010-11 — NAHL 56 7 24 31 0.554 0.2034 0.2034 0.5843 0.5844
2011-12 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 59 15 28 43 0.729 0.2678 0.2546 0.7692 0.7314
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Nichols D3 CNE SR 27 7 21 28 1.037
2014-15 Nichols D3 CNE JR 28 12 18 30 1.071
2013-14 Nichols D3 CNE SO 26 5 14 19 0.731
2012-13 Nichols D3 CNE FR 20 5 11 16 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2012-13 · Nichols
+299.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18700
Forward overall
#694
Forward born in 1991
#1138
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braedyn Aubin
Norwich · 2018-19
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Wynia
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Bessing
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.