IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Wynia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-08-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Canmore Eagles AJHL 39 5 3 8 0.205 0.0688 0.0746 0.1898 0.2058
2008-09 — AJHL 48 6 5 11 0.229 0.0769 0.0802 0.2121 0.2212
2009-10 Calgary Canucks AJHL 55 26 29 55 1.000 0.3354 0.3326 0.9254 0.9177
2010-11 Calgary Canucks AJHL 60 28 27 55 0.917 0.3075 0.2888 0.8483 0.7967
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 23 4 6 10 0.435
2013-14 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 25 11 5 16 0.640
2012-13 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 25 7 2 9 0.360
2011-12 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 19 9 6 15 0.789
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2011-12 · Fredonia
+201.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20226
Forward overall
#796
Forward born in 1990
#466
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brenden Kotyk
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Keefer
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.839 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Graham Day
Johnson & Wales · 2016-17
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.