IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Wynia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-08-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Canmore Eagles AJHL 39 5 3 8 0.205 0.0685 0.0743 0.1904 0.2065
2008-09 — AJHL 48 6 5 11 0.229 0.0766 0.0799 0.2128 0.2219
2009-10 Calgary Canucks AJHL 55 26 29 55 1.000 0.3340 0.3312 0.9283 0.9206
2010-11 Calgary Canucks AJHL 60 28 27 55 0.917 0.3062 0.2876 0.8510 0.7992
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Fredonia D3 — SR 23 4 6 10 0.435
2013-14 Fredonia D3 — JR 25 11 5 16 0.640
2012-13 Fredonia D3 — SO 25 7 2 9 0.360
2011-12 Fredonia D3 — FR 19 9 6 15 0.789
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2011-12 · Fredonia
+202.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13385
Forward overall
#577
Forward born in 1990
#550
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brenden Kotyk
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Tretowicz
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Stefan Koproske
Western New England · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.