IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bradley Robbins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-08-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 42 13 21 34 0.809 0.4775 0.4584 2.3849 2.2896
2011-12 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 57 25 27 52 0.912 0.5382 0.4915 2.6878 2.4548
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 28 19 13 32 1.143
2014-15 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 24 9 8 17 0.708
2013-14 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SO 19 1 1 2 0.105
2012-13 Bemidji State D1 — FR 25 0 2 2 0.080
2007-08 Miami D1 — SR 21 1 2 3 0.143
2006-07 Miami D1 — JR 39 0 4 4 0.103
2005-06 Miami D1 — SO 38 3 5 8 0.210
2004-05 Miami D1 — FR 37 1 3 4 0.108

NCAAe Rankings

#6573
Forward overall
#278
Forward born in 1991
#477
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Kalinowski
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Yuel
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Ford
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.