← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Kalinowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 57 8 23 31 0.544 0.3464 0.3495 1.6299 1.6445
2014-15 USHL 50 2 9 11 0.220 0.1401 0.1345 0.6593 0.6328
2015-16 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 6 2 9 11 1.833 0.3934 0.3770 0.8978 0.8604
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Endicott D3 CNE SR 26 6 18 24 0.923
2018-19 Endicott D3 CNE JR 27 8 10 18 0.667
2017-18 Endicott D3 CNE SO 25 9 20 29 1.160
2016-17 Endicott D3 CNE FR 29 14 24 38 1.310
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.31
2016-17 · Endicott
+446.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17222
Forward overall
#653
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2018-19
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.