| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 57 | 8 | 23 | 31 | 0.544 | 0.3464 | 0.3495 | 1.6299 | 1.6445 |
| 2014-15 | — | USHL | 50 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0.220 | 0.1401 | 0.1345 | 0.6593 | 0.6328 |
| 2015-16 | Connecticut RoughRiders | EHL | 6 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 1.833 | 0.3934 | 0.3770 | 0.8978 | 0.8604 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Endicott | D3 | CNE | SR | 26 | 6 | 18 | 24 | 0.923 |
| 2018-19 | Endicott | D3 | CNE | JR | 27 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 0.667 |
| 2017-18 | Endicott | D3 | CNE | SO | 25 | 9 | 20 | 29 | 1.160 |
| 2016-17 | Endicott | D3 | CNE | FR | 29 | 14 | 24 | 38 | 1.310 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.