IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Kalinowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 57 8 23 31 0.544 0.3208 0.3237 1.6335 1.6481
2014-15 — USHL 50 2 9 11 0.220 0.1298 0.1246 0.6607 0.6341
2015-16 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 6 2 9 11 1.833 0.4235 0.4058 0.8970 0.8596
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Endicott D1 CNE SR 26 6 18 24 0.923
2019-20 Endicott D3 CNE SR 26 6 18 24 0.923
2018-19 Endicott D1 CNE JR 27 8 10 18 0.667
2018-19 Endicott D3 CNE JR 27 8 10 18 0.667
2017-18 Endicott D3 CNE SO 25 9 20 29 1.160
2016-17 Endicott D3 CNE FR 29 14 24 38 1.310
2015-16 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#25841
Forward overall
#996
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Krapian
Post · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
R.J. Kleiman
Curry · 2010-11
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Hoover
Lebanon Valley · 2022-23
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.