IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stefan Koproske Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New York Bobcats EHL 29 8 6 14 0.483 0.1115 0.1066 1.6444 1.5877
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Western New England D1 CNE SR 21 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Western New England D3 CNE SR 21 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Western New England D3 CNE JR 23 2 1 3 0.130
2016-17 Western New England D3 CNE SO 24 3 7 10 0.417
2015-16 Western New England D3 CNE FR 11 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#33657
Forward overall
#1302
Forward born in 1994
#1165
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Boyd Stahlbaum
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Scanlon
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Desmet
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.