IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Scanlon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 39 12 20 32 0.821 0.1104 0.1147 0.2793 0.2901
2022-23 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 42 23 49 72 1.714 0.2307 0.2283 0.5835 0.5774
2023-24 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 42 36 72 108 2.571 0.3461 0.3258 0.8753 0.8238
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Dartmouth D3 — SO 25 7 18 25 1.000
2024-25 UMass Dartmouth D3 — FR 18 7 4 11 0.611
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2024-25 · UMass Dartmouth
+125.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2286
Defenseman overall
#521
Defenseman born in 2003
#46
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2017-18
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Soik
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2006-07
1.346 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hassan Akl
Aurora · 2021-22
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.