← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Scanlon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 39 12 20 32 0.821 0.1073 0.1114 0.2785 0.2893
2022-23 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 42 23 49 72 1.714 0.2242 0.2218 0.5818 0.5757
2023-24 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 42 36 72 108 2.571 0.3363 0.3165 0.8727 0.8214
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 25 7 18 25 1.000
2024-25 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 18 7 4 11 0.611
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2024-25 · UMass Dartmouth
+132.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#760
Defenseman overall
#85
Defenseman born in 2003
#37
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2017-18
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.