← New Search ↗ Social Card

Boyd Stahlbaum Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 52 28 21 49 0.942 0.2310 0.2260 0.6488 0.6346
2022-23 OJHL 50 29 43 72 1.440 0.3529 0.3271 0.9914 0.9191
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 29 12 15 27 0.931
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 21 1 13 14 0.667
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 27 13 17 30 1.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.11
2023-24 · Wisconsin-Stout
+352.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10872
Forward overall
#529
Forward born in 2002
#198
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby · 2023-24
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.