IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jarrod Fitzpatrick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — EHL 41 11 18 29 0.707 0.1634 0.1642 0.3461 0.3478
2015-16 Northern Cyclones EHL 36 16 28 44 1.222 0.2823 0.2713 0.5980 0.5746
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Utica D1 UCHC SR 28 7 12 19 0.679
2019-20 Utica D3 UCHC SR 28 7 12 19 0.679
2018-19 Utica D1 UCHC JR 23 6 5 11 0.478
2018-19 Utica D3 UCHC JR 23 6 5 11 0.478
2017-18 Utica D3 UCHC SO 11 1 5 6 0.545
2016-17 Utica D3 UCHC FR 24 11 7 18 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2016-17 · Utica
+283.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11982
Forward overall
#488
Forward born in 1995
#138
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Chauvin
New England College · 2018-19
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dom Kuziak
Castleton · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Carlson
Augsburg · 2003-04
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.