IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Geric Brodt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-08-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Williams Lake TimberWolves BCHL 50 2 13 15 0.300 0.1168 0.1155 0.4375 0.4326
2006-07 Dauphin Kings MJHL 63 25 29 54 0.857 0.2425 0.2287 0.5401 0.5095
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Wentworth D3 — JR 25 6 11 17 0.680
2008-09 Wentworth D3 — SO 23 4 15 19 0.826
2007-08 Wentworth D3 — FR 26 9 12 21 0.808
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2007-08 · Wentworth
+414.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21405
Forward overall
#840
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Panisa
St. Olaf · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Stubbs
Morrisville · 2014-15
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Michalchuk
Middlebury · 2001-02
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.