← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeffrey Gauld Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.1226 0.1323 0.3443 0.3715
2015-16 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 50 8 10 18 0.360 0.0882 0.0903 0.2479 0.2538
2016-17 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 52 18 13 31 0.596 0.1461 0.1431 0.4105 0.4019
2017-18 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 15 4 4 8 0.533 0.1307 0.1217 0.3672 0.3419
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Canton D1 SUNYAC FR 11 3 6 9 0.818
2018-19 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 11 3 6 9 0.818
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2018-19 · Canton
+633.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36071
Forward overall
#1715
Forward born in 1997
#2129
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Post · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2025-26
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.