IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian La Croix Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New England Wolves EHL 42 19 13 32 0.762 0.1760 0.1871 0.3728 0.3964
2015-16 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 40 14 20 34 0.850 0.1963 0.2001 0.4159 0.4240
2016-17 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 44 9 19 28 0.636 0.1470 0.1432 0.3114 0.3033
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Curry D3 CNE — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Curry D3 CNE — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 King's D3 MAC — 18 5 1 6 0.333
2017-18 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast — 15 4 4 8 0.533
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2017-18 · Plymouth State
+275.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20764
Forward overall
#825
Forward born in 1996
#455
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Linart
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Reichert
Wisconsin-Superior · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Vinson
Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.