| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Nipawin Hawks | SJHL | 57 | 6 | 17 | 23 | 0.404 | 0.1034 | 0.1041 | 0.3042 | 0.3062 |
| 2011-12 | Nipawin Hawks | SJHL | 56 | 10 | 33 | 43 | 0.768 | 0.1967 | 0.1873 | 0.5788 | 0.5513 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | — | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.091 |
| 2014-15 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2012-13 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | WIAC | — | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.