← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Krenke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Blake USHS-MN 31 4 8 12 0.387 0.1042 0.1042 0.0940 0.0940
2020-21 Blake USHS-MN 17 8 9 17 1.000 0.2692 0.2692 0.2429 0.2429
2021-22 Omaha Lancers USHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0637 0.0683 0.2997 0.3212
2022-23 Blake USHS-MN 26 18 28 46 1.769 0.4763 0.4763 0.5294 0.5630
2023-24 NAHL 44 4 5 9 0.204 0.0759 0.0771 0.2165 0.2199
2024-25 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 59 17 29 46 0.780 0.2895 0.2788 0.8255 0.7951
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 27 11 8 19 0.704
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2025-26 · Saint John's
+314.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13306
Forward overall
#601
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.839 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.