| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Blake | USHS-MN | 31 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.387 | 0.1042 | 0.1042 | 0.0940 | 0.0940 |
| 2020-21 | Blake | USHS-MN | 17 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 1.000 | 0.2692 | 0.2692 | 0.2429 | 0.2429 |
| 2021-22 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.100 | 0.0637 | 0.0683 | 0.2997 | 0.3212 |
| 2022-23 | Blake | USHS-MN | 26 | 18 | 28 | 46 | 1.769 | 0.4763 | 0.4763 | 0.5294 | 0.5630 |
| 2023-24 | — | NAHL | 44 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.204 | 0.0759 | 0.0771 | 0.2165 | 0.2199 |
| 2024-25 | Corpus Christi IceRays | NAHL | 59 | 17 | 29 | 46 | 0.780 | 0.2895 | 0.2788 | 0.8255 | 0.7951 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Saint John's | D3 | MIAC | FR | 27 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 0.704 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.