← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Krenke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Blake USHS-MN 31 4 8 12 0.387 0.0490 0.0490 0.0940 0.0940
2020-21 Blake USHS-MN 17 8 9 17 1.000 0.1266 0.1266 0.2429 0.2429
2021-22 Omaha Lancers USHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0590 0.0632 0.3003 0.3219
2022-23 Blake USHS-MN 26 18 28 46 1.769 0.2240 0.2240 0.5278 0.5613
2023-24 NAHL 44 4 5 9 0.204 0.0751 0.0763 0.2158 0.2192
2024-25 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 59 17 29 46 0.780 0.2865 0.2760 0.8230 0.7927
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 27 11 8 19 0.704
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2025-26 · Saint John's
+319.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18335
Forward overall
#929
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2018-19
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.