IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Gamache Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-09-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.1444 0.1590 0.3764 0.4146
2009-10 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 58 11 19 30 0.517 0.1727 0.1804 0.4801 0.5016
2010-11 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 49 26 30 56 1.143 0.3817 0.3787 1.0610 1.0528
2011-12 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 32 20 25 45 1.406 0.4697 0.4422 1.3054 1.2291
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 23 7 19 26 1.130
2014-15 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 27 7 11 18 0.667
2013-14 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 26 10 15 25 0.962
2012-13 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 25 8 6 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2012-13 · Hobart
+57.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5865
Forward overall
#220
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Peters
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Berry
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shayne Morrissey
Neumann · 2011-12
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.