icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Janesville Jets | NAHL | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.286 | 0.1050 | 0.1149 | 0.3016 | 0.3300 |
| 2011-12 | Springfield Jr. Blues | NAHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Mason City Toros | NA3HL | 43 | 33 | 33 | 66 | 1.535 | 0.1926 | 0.1872 | 0.4846 | 0.4710 |
| 2013-14 | Mason City Toros | NA3HL | 46 | 50 | 68 | 118 | 2.565 | 0.3219 | 0.3004 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Aurora | D3 | NCHA | — | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.333 |
| 2016-17 | Aurora | D3 | NCHA | — | 24 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.250 |
| 2015-16 | Aurora | D3 | NCHA | — | 25 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 0.480 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.