IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Cox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Fresno Monsters NAHL 48 11 18 29 0.604 0.2394 0.2376 0.6343 0.6296
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 21 5 3 8 0.381
2014-15 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 20 2 5 7 0.350
2013-14 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 23 4 4 8 0.348
2012-13 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 27 5 16 21 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2012-13 · Wentworth
+282.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22523
Forward overall
#793
Forward born in 1991
#1661
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Deiter Stange
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence Cornellier
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Morris
Elmira · 2000-01
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.