← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alfred Larsson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-11 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Malmö Redhawks U20 SHL-J20 30 5 11 16 0.533 0.2964 0.3117 0.7106 0.7472
2011-12 Malmö Redhawks U20 SHL-J20 48 7 7 14 0.292 0.1621 0.1631 0.3887 0.3911
2012-13 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 49 8 11 19 0.388 0.2288 0.2180 1.1647 1.1099
2013-14 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 39 3 13 16 0.410 0.2420 0.2193 1.2323 1.1167
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SR 37 3 8 11 0.297
2016-17 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 34 1 4 5 0.147
2015-16 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SO 31 1 1 2 0.065
2014-15 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 15 3 0 3 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2014-15 · Merrimack
+6.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24411
Forward overall
#847
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2010-11
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.