IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alfred Larsson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-11 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Malmö Redhawks U20 SHL-J20 30 5 11 16 0.533 0.2975 0.3128 0.7685 0.8081
2011-12 Malmö Redhawks U20 SHL-J20 48 7 7 14 0.292 0.1627 0.1637 0.4204 0.4230
2012-13 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 49 8 11 19 0.388 0.2470 0.2354 1.1621 1.1074
2013-14 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 39 3 13 16 0.410 0.2613 0.2368 1.2295 1.1141
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SR 37 3 8 11 0.297
2016-17 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 34 1 4 5 0.147
2015-16 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SO 31 1 1 2 0.065
2014-15 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 15 3 0 3 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2014-15 · Merrimack
-1.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16263
Forward overall
#613
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Scorcia
Salve Regina · 2010-11
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Laganiere
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Paul
Bethel · 2008-09
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.