| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Motor City Metal Jackets | NAHL | 57 | 15 | 19 | 34 | 0.597 | 0.2215 | 0.2188 | 0.6316 | 0.6239 |
| 2010-11 | Motor City Metal Jackets | NAHL | 56 | 16 | 38 | 54 | 0.964 | 0.3580 | 0.3354 | 1.0210 | 0.9565 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Salve Regina | D3 | CNE | SR | 23 | 10 | 17 | 27 | 1.174 |
| 2013-14 | Salve Regina | D3 | CNE | JR | 26 | 11 | 7 | 18 | 0.692 |
| 2012-13 | Salve Regina | D3 | CNE | SO | 25 | 11 | 20 | 31 | 1.240 |
| 2011-12 | Salve Regina | D3 | CNE | FR | 25 | 8 | 21 | 29 | 1.160 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.