← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-05-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 56 14 25 39 0.696 0.2326 0.2389 0.6465 0.6640
2007-08 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 61 17 29 46 0.754 0.2519 0.2448 0.7000 0.6804
2008-09 AJHL 58 23 25 48 0.828 0.2764 0.2571 0.7683 0.7148
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Marian D3 NCHA GR 8 3 2 5 0.625
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA SR 27 10 11 21 0.778
2012-13 Marian D3 NCHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Marian D3 NCHA SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Marian D3 NCHA FR 27 18 13 31 1.148
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.15
2010-11 · Marian
+431.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13765
Forward overall
#618
Forward born in 1988
#576
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2010-11
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.