← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Iacullo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Peoria Mustangs NA3HL 16 17 13 30 1.875 0.2259 0.2322 0.5923 0.6089
2016-17 Peoria Mustangs NA3HL 44 31 25 56 1.273 0.1534 0.1499 0.4020 0.3930
2017-18 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 43 13 34 47 1.093 0.1471 0.1372 0.3721 0.3471
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SR 21 3 5 8 0.381
2020-21 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SO 28 12 15 27 0.964
2018-19 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 FR 29 9 10 19 0.655
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.66
2018-19 · Saint Anselm
+437.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24855
Forward overall
#1077
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2013-14
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.