IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Gattelaro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-05-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Kalamazoo Jr. K-Wings NAHL 60 23 23 46 0.767 0.2817 0.2922 0.8093 0.8395
2012-13 Kalamazoo Jr. K-Wings NAHL 59 13 32 45 0.763 0.2802 0.2766 0.8050 0.7946
2013-14 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 56 17 28 45 0.804 0.2952 0.2766 0.8482 0.7947
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 22 3 3 6 0.273
2015-16 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 28 9 10 19 0.679
2014-15 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 28 14 11 25 0.893
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2014-15 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+277.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14767
Forward overall
#535
Forward born in 1993
#679
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Coleman Jenkins
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Yzaguirre
Utica · 2017-18
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Davis Ross
Marian · 2015-16
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.