IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Davis Ross Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-05-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Portage Terriers MJHL 60 7 12 19 0.317 0.0610 0.0631 0.1997 0.2064
2014-15 Portage Terriers MJHL 51 4 26 30 0.588 0.1132 0.1111 0.3709 0.3641
2015-16 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 23 5 18 23 1.000 0.1925 0.1789 0.6306 0.5860
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Marian D3 NCHA — 28 3 19 22 0.786
2018-19 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC GR 22 2 7 9 0.409
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 26 8 8 16 0.615
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 18 1 5 6 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2016-17 · St. Scholastica
+132.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7225
Defenseman overall
#1150
Defenseman born in 1995
#415
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Bohn
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2005-06
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Martinez
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Conter
Southern Maine · 2006-07
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.