IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Bohn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-05-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Santa Fe Roadrunners NAHL 53 13 15 28 0.528 0.1962 0.1911 0.5594 0.5450
2005-06 Santa Fe Roadrunners NAHL 57 8 23 31 0.544 0.2020 0.1868 0.5759 0.5325
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Saint Mary's D3 — SR 25 5 12 17 0.680
2008-09 St. Mary's D3 — JR 10 1 9 10 1.000
2007-08 St. Mary's D3 — SO 25 5 26 31 1.240
2006-07 St. Mary's D3 — FR 25 8 19 27 1.080
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.08
2006-07 · St. Mary's
+569.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20289
Forward overall
#751
Forward born in 1985
#1934
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dain Sardelli
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Dunner
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Zizek
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.