IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Dunner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — NA3HL 42 21 34 55 1.310 0.1578 0.1614 — —
2015-16 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 45 35 42 77 1.711 0.2062 0.2009 0.5405 0.5266
2016-17 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 37 12 24 36 0.973 0.2088 0.1988 0.4765 0.4536
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fredonia D3 — JR 20 8 2 10 0.500
2018-19 Fredonia D3 — SO 16 2 9 11 0.688
2017-18 Fredonia D3 — FR 22 3 9 12 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2017-18 · Fredonia
+219.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20679
Forward overall
#859
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Scuglia
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Erick Ware
SUNY Potsdam · 2010-11
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Timmy Nicksic
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.581 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.