IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Dunner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — NA3HL 42 21 34 55 1.310 0.1643 0.1681 — —
2015-16 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 45 35 42 77 1.711 0.2147 0.2092 0.5402 0.5263
2016-17 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 37 12 24 36 0.973 0.2248 0.2140 0.4761 0.4532
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fredonia D1 SUNYAC JR 20 8 2 10 0.500
2019-20 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 20 8 2 10 0.500
2018-19 Fredonia D1 SUNYAC SO 16 2 9 11 0.688
2018-19 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 16 2 9 11 0.688
2017-18 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 22 3 9 12 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2017-18 · Fredonia
+200.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12254
Forward overall
#495
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Scuglia
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Braeden Kennedy
Framingham State · 2022-23
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Erick Ware
SUNY Potsdam · 2010-11
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.