IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Scuglia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-04-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Aurora Tigers OJHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0698 0.0736 0.1725 0.1819
2008-09 Brampton Capitals OJHL 37 3 3 6 0.162 0.0453 0.0454 0.1119 0.1123
2009-10 Brampton Capitals OJHL 53 20 38 58 1.094 0.3057 0.2907 0.7552 0.7180
2010-11 Brampton Capitals OJHL 44 23 37 60 1.364 0.3810 0.3445 0.9410 0.8509
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 5 1 1 2 0.400
2012-13 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 9 1 2 3 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2011-12 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+20.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11934
Forward overall
#521
Forward born in 1990
#621
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brad Carpenter
Wentworth · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Parsons
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Sikich
Saint Mary's · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.