IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erick Ware Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Texas Tornado NAHL 55 3 24 27 0.491 0.1823 0.1794 0.5198 0.5115
2010-11 — NAHL 45 6 19 25 0.556 0.2063 0.1925 0.5883 0.5489
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SR 25 1 5 6 0.240
2013-14 SUNY Potsdam D3 — JR 21 2 11 13 0.619
2012-13 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SO 26 4 6 10 0.385
2011-12 SUNY Potsdam D3 — FR 21 4 13 17 0.809
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2011-12 · SUNY Potsdam
+357.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4258
Defenseman overall
#859
Defenseman born in 1990
#2000
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelby Lorenz
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Kussmann
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luc Boby
Utica · 2012-13
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.