IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Zizek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Nepean Raiders CCHL 51 10 16 26 0.510 0.1455 0.1477 0.3946 0.4007
2014-15 Nepean Raiders CCHL 59 21 26 47 0.797 0.2273 0.2203 0.6166 0.5977
2015-16 Nepean Raiders CCHL 62 12 37 49 0.790 0.2256 0.2078 0.6118 0.5634
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 27 13 13 26 0.963
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 28 13 12 25 0.893
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 26 13 18 31 1.192
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 9 3 3 6 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2016-17 · SUNY Oswego
+265.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19206
Forward overall
#742
Forward born in 1995
#559
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor McKinney
Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Balas
Adrian · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Ayers
Castleton · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.