IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Zizek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Nepean Raiders CCHL 51 10 16 26 0.510 0.1106 0.1123 0.3905 0.3965
2014-15 Nepean Raiders CCHL 59 21 26 47 0.797 0.1728 0.1675 0.6102 0.5915
2015-16 Nepean Raiders CCHL 62 12 37 49 0.790 0.1714 0.1578 0.6054 0.5575
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Oswego D1 — SR 27 13 13 26 0.963
2019-20 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 27 13 13 26 0.963
2018-19 Oswego D1 — JR 28 13 12 25 0.893
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 28 13 12 25 0.893
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 26 13 18 31 1.192
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 9 3 3 6 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2016-17 · SUNY Oswego
+381.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24028
Forward overall
#909
Forward born in 1995
#472
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Starzi
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Salvatore Cerrato
Utica · 2024-25
0.690 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Kussmann
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.