← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor McKinney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-05-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 41 8 8 16 0.390 0.0956 0.1044 0.2687 0.2933
2005-06 OJHL 47 16 16 32 0.681 0.1669 0.1761 0.4688 0.4945
2006-07 OJHL 37 15 18 33 0.892 0.2186 0.2197 0.6141 0.6171
2007-08 Durham Fury OJHL 49 23 21 44 0.898 0.2201 0.2112 0.6183 0.5933
2008-09 OJHL 46 37 28 65 1.413 0.3463 0.3145 0.9729 0.8837
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 27 12 9 21 0.778
2011-12 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 27 16 14 30 1.111
2010-11 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 25 17 9 26 1.040
2009-10 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 25 5 5 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2009-10 · Buffalo State
+71.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12891
Forward overall
#500
Forward born in 1988
#325
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2005-06
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.