← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andy Willock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-06-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 20 2 4 6 0.300 0.0838 0.0908 0.2070 0.2242
2002-03 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 42 8 15 23 0.548 0.1530 0.1594 0.3779 0.3936
2003-04 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 37 12 20 32 0.865 0.2417 0.2409 0.5969 0.5949
2004-05 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 49 22 47 69 1.408 0.3935 0.3723 0.9718 0.9195
2005-06 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 37 16 29 45 1.216 0.3398 0.3090 0.8393 0.7633
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SR 28 7 16 23 0.821
2008-09 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 JR 25 6 8 14 0.560
2007-08 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SO 24 5 22 27 1.125
2006-07 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 FR 22 3 13 16 0.727
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2006-07 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+154.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8280
Forward overall
#288
Forward born in 1985
#287
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2009-10
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.