← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andy Willock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-06-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 20 2 4 6 0.300 0.0735 0.0796 0.2065 0.2237
2002-03 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 42 8 15 23 0.548 0.1342 0.1398 0.3770 0.3927
2003-04 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 37 12 20 32 0.865 0.2120 0.2113 0.5955 0.5935
2004-05 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 49 22 47 69 1.408 0.3451 0.3265 0.9695 0.9174
2005-06 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 37 16 29 45 1.216 0.2981 0.2711 0.8374 0.7615
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 28 7 16 23 0.821
2008-09 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 25 6 8 14 0.560
2007-08 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 24 5 22 27 1.125
2006-07 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 22 3 13 16 0.727
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2006-07 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+189.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11540
Forward overall
#368
Forward born in 1985
#250
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2022-23
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2009-10
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.