| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Smiths Falls Bears | CCHL | 45 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 0.311 | 0.0888 | 0.0951 | 0.2408 | 0.2579 |
| 2007-08 | Smiths Falls Bears | CCHL | 32 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.188 | 0.0535 | 0.0547 | 0.1451 | 0.1484 |
| 2008-09 | — | CCHL | 59 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 0.424 | 0.1209 | 0.1166 | 0.3280 | 0.3163 |
| 2009-10 | — | CCHL | 50 | 16 | 19 | 35 | 0.700 | 0.1998 | 0.1835 | 0.5419 | 0.4976 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Westfield State | D3 | MASCAC | SR | 25 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 1.040 |
| 2012-13 | Westfield State | D3 | MASCAC | JR | 25 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 0.840 |
| 2011-12 | Westfield State | D3 | MASCAC | SO | 26 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0.500 |
| 2010-11 | Westfield State | D3 | MASCAC | FR | 24 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 1.083 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.