IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vince Perreault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-07-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 45 6 8 14 0.311 0.0675 0.0723 0.2407 0.2578
2007-08 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 32 1 5 6 0.188 0.0407 0.0416 0.1451 0.1484
2008-09 — CCHL 59 13 12 25 0.424 0.0919 0.0886 0.3278 0.3161
2009-10 — CCHL 50 16 19 35 0.700 0.1518 0.1394 0.5416 0.4973
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 25 9 17 26 1.040
2012-13 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 25 11 10 21 0.840
2011-12 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 26 3 10 13 0.500
2010-11 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 24 15 11 26 1.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.08
2010-11 · Westfield State
+963.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35360
Forward overall
#1167
Forward born in 1989
#858
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Gannon
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Caveney
Fitchburg State · 2008-09
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joonas Linnavuori
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.