← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vince Perreault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-07-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 45 6 8 14 0.311 0.0888 0.0951 0.2408 0.2579
2007-08 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 32 1 5 6 0.188 0.0535 0.0547 0.1451 0.1484
2008-09 CCHL 59 13 12 25 0.424 0.1209 0.1166 0.3280 0.3163
2009-10 CCHL 50 16 19 35 0.700 0.1998 0.1835 0.5419 0.4976
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 25 9 17 26 1.040
2012-13 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 25 11 10 21 0.840
2011-12 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 26 3 10 13 0.500
2010-11 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 24 15 11 26 1.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.08
2010-11 · Westfield State
+707.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29194
Forward overall
#1133
Forward born in 1989
#1021
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2024-25
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia Wisconsin · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.