IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Rudy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-06-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Cornwall Colts CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Cornwall Colts CCHL 30 4 5 9 0.300 0.0651 0.0659 0.2321 0.2349
2009-10 Wellington Dukes OJHL 50 26 28 54 1.080 0.2647 0.2542 0.7436 0.7141
2010-11 Wellington Dukes OJHL 48 22 51 73 1.521 0.3727 0.3406 1.0471 0.9568
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 16 8 3 11 0.688
2014-15 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 21 8 8 16 0.762
2012-13 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 2 0 1 1 0.500
2011-12 Bemidji State D1 CCHA — 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#13427
Forward overall
#536
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cooper Board
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Williams
Marian · 2008-09
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Belger
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.