IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Conter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-05-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 — OJHL 50 9 25 34 0.680 0.1900 0.1818 0.4693 0.4489
2006-07 Oakville Blades OJHL 44 5 25 30 0.682 0.1905 0.1727 0.4705 0.4265
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SR 26 10 15 25 0.962
2009-10 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast JR 26 7 18 25 0.962
2008-09 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SO 25 8 18 26 1.040
2007-08 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast FR 22 8 11 19 0.864
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2007-08 · Southern Maine
+418.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4574
Defenseman overall
#843
Defenseman born in 1986
#1659
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amit Grumet-Morris
Becker · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Alarie
Morrisville · 2005-06
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Thorogood
Marian · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.