IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Day Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 New Hampton NE-Prep 31 1 8 9 0.290 0.0819 0.0819 0.1328 0.1328
2022-23 New Hampton NE-Prep 35 21 29 50 1.429 0.4030 0.4030 0.6537 0.6537
2023-24 — NCDC 40 2 6 8 0.200 0.1115 0.1109 0.1617 0.1608
2024-25 — NCDC 56 15 28 43 0.768 0.4282 0.4067 0.6209 0.5897
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 18 0 10 10 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2025-26 · Skidmore
+125.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13745
Forward overall
#633
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Conter
Southern Maine · 2006-07
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Nitkin
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Carpenter
Colby · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.