IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Alarie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-05-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Oshawa Legionaires OJHL 47 13 17 30 0.638 0.1783 0.1614 0.4405 0.3987
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Morrisville D3 — SR 26 7 14 21 0.808
2008-09 Morrisville D3 — JR 25 9 8 17 0.680
2007-08 Morrisville D3 — SO 25 7 7 14 0.560
2006-07 Morrisville D3 — FR 15 4 6 10 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2006-07 · Morrisville
+382.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23150
Forward overall
#836
Forward born in 1985
#1867
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Dunn
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Keck
SUNY Potsdam · 2015-16
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Preston Hazelton
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.