← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Dunn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Jersey Rockets EHL 27 3 0 3 0.111 0.0238 0.0248 0.0544 0.0567
2014-15 New York Bobcats EHL 35 7 7 14 0.400 0.0858 0.0854 0.1959 0.1949
2015-16 New York Bobcats EHL 40 14 23 37 0.925 0.1985 0.1887 0.4530 0.4307
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Neumann D3 MAC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Neumann D3 MAC 4 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Neumann D3 MAC 4 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Fredonia D3 FR 7 1 2 3 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2016-17 · Fredonia
+239.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32924
Forward overall
#1380
Forward born in 1995
#782
in EHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2005-06
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.