IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Dunn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Jersey Rockets EHL 27 3 0 3 0.111 0.0257 0.0268 0.0544 0.0567
2014-15 New York Bobcats EHL 35 7 7 14 0.400 0.0924 0.0919 0.1957 0.1947
2015-16 New York Bobcats EHL 40 14 23 37 0.925 0.2137 0.2032 0.4526 0.4303
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Neumann D3 MAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Neumann D3 MAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Neumann D3 MAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 7 1 2 3 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2016-17 · Fredonia
+215.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28395
Forward overall
#1106
Forward born in 1995
#820
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brad Dormiedy
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Fletcher
Marian · 2005-06
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amit Grumet-Morris
Becker · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.