IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Derton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1982-06-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Powell River Kings BCHL 58 6 9 15 0.259 0.0996 0.1015 0.3763 0.3835
2001-02 — BCHL 53 8 33 41 0.774 0.2981 0.2874 1.1258 1.0853
2002-03 Vernon Vipers BCHL 51 4 28 32 0.627 0.2418 0.2226 0.9132 0.8408
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 27 7 21 28 1.037
2005-06 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 28 10 24 34 1.214
2004-05 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 28 8 14 22 0.786
2003-04 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 30 3 16 19 0.633
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2003-04 · St. Norbert
+169.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5817
Defenseman overall
#692
Defenseman born in 1982
#1346
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Owen Sikich
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Morton
Curry · 2024-25
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Foley
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.710 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.