← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Yzaguirre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New York Bobcats EHL 38 20 16 36 0.947 0.2188 0.2320 0.4636 0.4916
2016-17 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1225 0.1219 0.3518 0.3501
2017-18 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 11 1 3 4 0.364 0.1336 0.1264 0.3838 0.3630
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Utica D3 UCHC SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Utica D1 UCHC JR 10 3 3 6 0.600
2020-21 Utica D3 UCHC JR 10 3 3 6 0.600
2019-20 Utica D1 UCHC SO 10 2 3 5 0.500
2019-20 Utica D3 UCHC SO 10 2 3 5 0.500
2018-19 Utica D1 UCHC FR 20 2 5 7 0.350
2018-19 Utica D3 UCHC FR 20 2 5 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2018-19 · Utica
+228.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12068
Forward overall
#542
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2009-10
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2023-24
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.