IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Hollander Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-07-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 North York Rangers OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 North York Rangers OJHL 41 8 8 16 0.390 0.0956 0.0926 0.2687 0.2602
2009-10 North York Rangers OJHL 45 14 21 35 0.778 0.1906 0.1746 0.5355 0.4905
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 9 2 1 3 0.333
2011-12 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 24 1 11 12 0.500
2010-11 Becker D3 — FR 15 4 3 7 0.467
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2010-11 · Becker
+284.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30663
Forward overall
#1022
Forward born in 1989
#1625
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Flynn
Babson · 2016-17
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Bottem
Marian · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Kroon
St. Scholastica · 2024-25
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.