← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christopher Lee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Okanagan European Eagles USPHL-Premier-Classic 42 2 4 6 0.143 0.0401 0.0446 0.1175 0.1307
2016-17 Okanagan European Eagles USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 5 9 14 0.342 0.0959 0.1020 0.2807 0.2987
2017-18 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 42 28 25 53 1.262 0.1656 0.1640 0.4284 0.4241
2018-19 — NCDC 45 14 14 28 0.622 0.2537 0.2393 0.4979 0.4697
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 New England College D3 LittleEast — 25 2 7 9 0.360
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC — 9 1 3 4 0.444
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC — 24 8 6 14 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2019-20 · Stevenson
+225.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14204
Forward overall
#648
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2009-10
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2014-15
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.