IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb Suderman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-06-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Winkler Flyers MJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0642 0.0697 0.2106 0.2288
2007-08 Winkler Flyers MJHL 47 11 14 25 0.532 0.1024 0.1057 0.3361 0.3470
2008-09 Winkler Flyers MJHL 33 9 23 32 0.970 0.1867 0.1835 0.6128 0.6024
2009-10 — MJHL 48 15 21 36 0.750 0.1444 0.1355 0.4739 0.4447
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 26 16 14 30 1.154
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 25 7 7 14 0.560
2011-12 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 25 2 10 12 0.480
2010-11 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 27 10 7 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2010-11 · Concordia
+331.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6657
Defenseman overall
#920
Defenseman born in 1989
#350
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elliot Van Orsdel
Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jay Dardis
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn O'Malley
Aurora · 2017-18
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.