← New Search ↗ Social Card

Coleman Jenkins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Tabor NE-Prep 28 9 16 25 0.893 0.1722 0.1722 0.4086 0.4086
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 26 6 6 12 0.462 0.1067 0.1067 0.3732 0.3732
2021-22 Tabor NE-Prep 22 14 11 25 1.136 0.2192 0.2192 0.5200 0.5200
2022-23 BCHL 25 3 4 7 0.280 0.1079 0.1051 0.4080 0.3972
2023-24 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 50 15 36 51 1.020 0.2357 0.2220 0.8248 0.7769
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 23 5 15 20 0.870
2024-25 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC 27 7 14 21 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2024-25 · Skidmore
+418.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8692
Forward overall
#363
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.