IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robert Clerc Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Collingwood Blues OJHL 46 22 33 55 1.196 0.2931 0.2802 0.8232 0.7870
2017-18 Collingwood Blues OJHL 51 30 33 63 1.235 0.3028 0.2749 0.8505 0.7721
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 27 10 11 21 0.778
2018-19 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 8 4 1 5 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2018-19 · SUNY Potsdam
+163.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11146
Forward overall
#507
Forward born in 1997
#212
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Pickup
Concordia · 2016-17
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Johnson
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Rooney
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.