← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Pickup Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0771 0.0863 0.2914 0.3260
2013-14 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 52 13 8 21 0.404 0.1556 0.1669 0.5884 0.6312
2014-15 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 56 10 11 21 0.375 0.1445 0.1483 0.5464 0.5606
2015-16 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 58 20 28 48 0.828 0.3189 0.3101 1.2059 1.1727
2016-17 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 53 27 38 65 1.226 0.4725 0.4353 1.7870 1.6465
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC 21 8 18 26 1.238
2020-21 Concordia (WI) D1 SR 21 8 18 26 1.238
2020-21 Concordia (WI) D3 SR 21 8 18 26 1.238
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC 24 7 8 15 0.625
2019-20 Concordia (WI) D1 JR 24 7 8 15 0.625
2019-20 Concordia (WI) D3 JR 24 7 8 15 0.625
2018-19 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 16 0 1 1 0.062
2017-18 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 9 1 2 3 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2017-18 · Nebraska Omaha
1.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12531
Forward overall
#509
Forward born in 1996
#442
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2001-02
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.100 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2008-09
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.