IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Hudson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-04-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.3340 0.3724 0.9283 1.0351
2006-07 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 42 4 19 23 0.548 0.1829 0.1868 0.5083 0.5192
2007-08 Canmore Eagles AJHL 60 27 50 77 1.283 0.4286 0.4142 1.1913 1.1512
2008-09 — AJHL 61 30 51 81 1.328 0.4435 0.4101 1.2327 1.1399
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 27 12 17 29 1.074
2011-12 Manhattanville D3 — JR 25 14 16 30 1.200
2010-11 Manhattanville D3 — SO 11 3 7 10 0.909
2009-10 Manhattanville D3 — FR 26 12 20 32 1.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.23
2009-10 · Manhattanville
+249.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6162
Forward overall
#287
Forward born in 1988
#128
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Italiano
Williams · 2013-14
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anders Grongstad
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Depp
Elmira · 2011-12
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.