← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Sooth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 NTDP-U18 26 4 5 9 0.346 0.2754 0.2818 1.2966 1.3266
2009-10 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 10 3 2 5 0.500 0.3184 0.3330 1.4984 1.5673
2010-11 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 60 10 33 43 0.717 0.4564 0.4543 2.1477 2.1380
2011-12 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 59 9 35 44 0.746 0.4749 0.4506 2.2349 2.1205
2012-13 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 60 13 44 57 0.950 0.6050 0.5418 2.8469 2.5497
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SR 19 5 5 10 0.526
2015-16 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 35 6 7 13 0.371
2014-15 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 38 6 15 21 0.553
2013-14 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 38 4 13 17 0.447
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.47
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2013-14 · Northern Michigan
-4.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2250
Forward overall
#116
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.