| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | — | NTDP-U18 | 26 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.346 | 0.2573 | 0.2633 | 1.2918 | 1.3217 |
| 2009-10 | Sioux City Musketeers | USHL | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.500 | 0.2949 | 0.3085 | 1.5017 | 1.5707 |
| 2010-11 | Dubuque Fighting Saints | USHL | 60 | 10 | 33 | 43 | 0.717 | 0.4228 | 0.4209 | 2.1525 | 2.1428 |
| 2011-12 | Dubuque Fighting Saints | USHL | 59 | 9 | 35 | 44 | 0.746 | 0.4399 | 0.4174 | 2.2399 | 2.1252 |
| 2012-13 | Dubuque Fighting Saints | USHL | 60 | 13 | 44 | 57 | 0.950 | 0.5604 | 0.5019 | 2.8532 | 2.5553 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Northern Michigan | D1 | WCHA | SR | 19 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.526 |
| 2015-16 | Northern Michigan | D1 | WCHA | JR | 35 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 0.371 |
| 2014-15 | Northern Michigan | D1 | WCHA | SO | 38 | 6 | 15 | 21 | 0.553 |
| 2013-14 | Northern Michigan | D1 | WCHA | FR | 38 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 0.447 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.