IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Dill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 43 13 38 51 1.186 0.1596 0.1596 0.4037 0.4037
2021-22 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 37 4 7 11 0.297 0.1104 0.1030 0.3148 0.2937
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 26 8 7 15 0.577
2024-25 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 21 5 9 14 0.667
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 24 9 18 27 1.125
2022-23 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 27 13 17 30 1.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.11
2022-23 · Salem State
+1159.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31307
Forward overall
#1260
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alec Brandrup
Norwich · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vinny Servizzi
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Kennedy
Wisconsin-Superior · 2009-10
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.