IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alec Brandrup Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-02-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 24 1 4 5 0.208 0.0773 0.0793 0.2205 0.2262
2012-13 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Melville Millionaires SJHL 53 8 21 29 0.547 0.1581 0.1463 0.4119 0.3812
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 27 4 10 14 0.518
2016-17 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 30 5 15 20 0.667
2015-16 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 25 2 7 9 0.360
2014-15 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 26 4 10 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2014-15 · Norwich
+377.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11262
Defenseman overall
#1437
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Whited
Wisconsin-Stout · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Lazier
Albertus Magnus · 2018-19
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael McChesney
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.