IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vinny Servizzi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 33 11 13 24 0.727 0.0876 0.0876 0.2298 0.2298
2021-22 Toledo Cherokee USPHL-Premier 43 28 29 57 1.326 0.1784 0.1645 0.4512 0.4162
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alvernia D3 MAC SR 26 4 5 9 0.346
2024-25 Alvernia D3 MAC JR 23 6 8 14 0.609
2023-24 Alvernia D3 MAC SO 26 5 6 11 0.423
2022-23 Alvernia D3 MAC FR 18 2 2 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2022-23 · Alvernia
+57.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29273
Forward overall
#1165
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Minerva
Neumann · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Sposit
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Antonio Demacopoulos
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.