IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 50 12 18 30 0.600 0.1733 0.1776 0.4517 0.4629
2008-09 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 47 7 18 25 0.532 0.1537 0.1499 0.4004 0.3904
2009-10 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 55 14 24 38 0.691 0.1996 0.1854 0.5201 0.4832
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Thomas D3 — SR 27 10 13 23 0.852
2015-16 St. Thomas D3 — JR 16 5 9 14 0.875
2014-15 St. Thomas D3 — SO 18 7 7 14 0.778
2013-14 St. Thomas D3 — FR 27 7 9 16 0.593
2010-11 Hamilton D3 NESCAC — 20 3 9 12 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2010-11 · Hamilton
+309.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23057
Forward overall
#912
Forward born in 1989
#730
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Vella
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Quagliata
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Graham
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.