← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 50 12 18 30 0.600 0.1537 0.1575 0.4523 0.4636
2008-09 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 47 7 18 25 0.532 0.1363 0.1329 0.4009 0.3909
2009-10 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 55 14 24 38 0.691 0.1770 0.1644 0.5208 0.4839
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SR 27 10 13 23 0.852
2015-16 St. Thomas D3 CCHA JR 16 5 9 14 0.875
2014-15 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SO 18 7 7 14 0.778
2013-14 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 27 7 9 16 0.593
2010-11 Hamilton D3 NESCAC 20 3 9 12 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2010-11 · Hamilton
+361.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30165
Forward overall
#1003
Forward born in 1989
#586
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2016-17
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2024-25
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2014-15
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.